Evaluations:

The Office of Instructional Technology relies on four measurements to assess the effectiveness of its programs:

Immediate evaluations of individual activities: After each workshop, the Coordinator of Instructional Technology administers an evaluation of the session including the competence of the instructor and the effectiveness of the performed activities. The attendees are asked to rate the instructor’s performance on a scale from 1 to 5 (1= Excellent, 2= Good, 3= Fair, 4= Poor, 5=Cannot Rate).

Log of Activities and Progress Reports: After each activity, the Coordinator of Instructional Technology reports on the progress of individual faculty members to a Consulting Log. Each activity is rated from 1 to 4 according to the four stages of the implementation of advanced technologies in instruction. The level of attainment of the faculty or staff member is also rated from 1 to 10 (1= novice, 10= Advanced). 

Suggestion Folder: The Office of Instructional Technology welcomes suggestions from Faculty, Staff, and Students. A special attention is paid to ideas aiming at improving the services of the office in terms of its initiatives, activities, and accomplishments. 

Annual assessment of the needs of individuals, groups, and departments, and the effectiveness of the office in meeting those needs: The Office of Instructional Technology also administers an annual survey (FMU On-Campus Activity Evaluation Form, modified by the Office of Instructional Technology) to determine the level of satisfaction provided by the office and the individual needs of Faculty and Staff members.